Ad Astra is without a doubt the hardest movie I’ve had to
review so far. The movie stars Brad Pitt and every single second of his
straight, emotionless acting. This is not a bad thing because that’s just how
his character is, and not a result of bad acting. I will say that everything in
this movie, much like actually being in space, is slow and deliberate. This works
for the purposes of the film but large portions of the movie are silent, accurately
mimicking the sensation of being in space. These moments of silence are
assisted by the score and absolutely stunning visuals that both serve to try to
keep the audience engaged when not a lot is actually happening on screen. When
I mentioned that everything about this movie is slow and deliberate, this
extends to those moments of silence and Brad Pitt voice over. The journey is
almost a character analysis of Brad Pitt playing Roy McBride. To summarize the
plot of the movie, it is essentially a journey to Neptune
but what makes it interesting is the fact that Ad Astra is deep and philosophical.
The ending leaves the audience feeling confused and these traits all serve to
make its audience mull Brad Pitt’s journey over, making its audience really
search their memories to discover what the movie is about. I personally enjoy
these unique kinds of films that do something different and challenge what a
movie can be about. However, I’m not the average movie viewer and I imagine
that there would be a group of people who might just find this movie long and
boring. For those who have seen it, the movie is like Gravity starring Sandra
Bullock in the sense that a lot of the movie is simple on the surface, but there
is a lot more happening emotionally. I will say that this movie is enjoyable if
you like to watch deep philosophical movies or if modern, accurate space films
are something that you enjoy seeing on screen. I believe that this movie has its
audience, but I wouldn’t give it as much praise as other critics who say that
it is a sci-fi masterpiece.
Joker stars Joaquin Pheonix as Batman's greatest villain the Joker. Even though this is a Joker movie there is no Batman in sight. This movie is part origin story, part tragedy, and part social commentary of modern society. The movie portrays the DC villain in a way that makes the viewer feel almost uncomfortable with how easy it is to understand how a fictional villain like the Joker could exist in modern society. As I mentioned previously this is also the Joker's origin story, which means it's told from the Joker's perspective and in his mind he's the hero of the story. This also plays to how it's a tragedy because the rising of The Joker is not an intentional move, he is almost brought into that role by those around him which makes him disturbingly relatable. The Joker's rise could even be attributed to the lack of funding or resources that is put into Gotham's mental health care services. This dives into the social commentary in the film. Joker may n...
Comments
Post a Comment